Some thoughts on Languages – Part I

Former Vice-president Hamid Ansari, in a speech just after his retirement, commented that nowadays, Urdu is associated with Muslims which is what has caused its reduced usage. Surely, the undertones of his statement should be seen in the context of present day political landscape.

However, when I read this report, I was reminded of my first year in college in Patna when I attended 18th Chandrashekhar Memorial Lecture as an audience. It was our first semester and all the NSS (National Service Scheme) students – of which I was a part – were mandated by the professor in-charge to go and listen to the lecture. A famous Dastango (storyteller) had come to deliver the lecture, though i don’t remember the name. The topic was about language, in quest of language for society, or something in similar spirit, don’t quite exactly remember that either. The speaker declared at the onset of his address with vigour that presently,our society is suffering from acute linguistic crisis and people, special the youth doesn’t know what their language is. He further added that successive governments have ignored Urdu to favour Hindi since independence. Audience must have been left amused by these thoughts. Further, suggesting solutions, he claimed that only Urdu or Hindustani were the answer to these (perceived) problems. He also talked about the Ganga-Jamuni heritage and secular credentials of the language. It was 2013 and intense campaign for 2014 elections had polarized the atmosphere. Surely, audience, including we students, had strong opinions and comments to make. After the lecture, a charged discussion ensued with some sharp questions coming to the speaker. An elderly person, who was someone important as he was being treated very respectfully by everyone, went to the dais and refuted the speaker’s argument saying that society has no need to adopt urdu or Hindustani as it has already knit a language for itself. And he drew wide support from audience for that.

I have narrated this incident as it quite successfully covers the arguments given by most people who mourn the downfall of urdu as well as the first-hand reaction they get. Also, it touches upon some present-day challenges and historical questions looming over the language debates in today’s India.

This is first introductory post in a series of a few blog-posts in which I will discuss and comment upon the language issues centered over northern parts of our country such as the circumstances in which Urdu developed, Hindi versus Urdu debate, secular credentials of languages, etc.

Read original Hindi post here. | मूल हिंदी पोस्ट यहाँ पढ़ें।


5 thoughts on “Some thoughts on Languages – Part I

  1. In my opinion, urdu is just a bastard version of hindi and Persian. Think about it, what exactly is urdu? It is the grammar of hindi using Persian words. There is no such thing as an urdu word, if it is a noun/adjective, it is mostly taken from Persian/Arabic and if it is a verb, it is taken from hindi.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I corrected the mistake for you, if you don’t mind. And very truly spoken friend, but I am afraid you are writing my very next post in the comment section here. 😂😰😱. Actually that’s the same thing I will deal with in my next post. I hope you enjoyed the post, though it’s not great or anything.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s